![]() ![]() This project beats the pants off Paragon NTFS, and they deserve it. If you benchmark the two, ext3 will win in most situations using bonnie++: Try turning on dir_index on a large ext3 volume and then grab a -mm kernel with reiser4. Reiserfs eats itsself, ext3 is rock solid. Also, I speak from experience as a Linux systems admin that works with ~100 SLES9 and some Unix Servers. ![]() Notice how Hans Reiser gives a totally busted response knowing he was caught in a lie. Hans Reiser being completely called on his BS publically on the Linux kernel Mailinglist how he altered the Reiser4 benchmarks page deceptively: I have seen about a 30% speedup on 5 of our Oracle servers at work: Numbers showing Reiser4 is a regression over Reiser3 and doesn’t much compare to ext3:Ī patch that speeds up ext3 up to 50% in some situations. If you would look at the actual numbers *instead* of spouting off, you would realize you are incorrect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |